If amy cuddy and her research team originally established a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group) and then discovered that 86% of the high-power group (86 of 100) took a gambling risk while 60% of the low-power group (60 of 100) took the risk, then the p-value would have been much lower than that originally found in question 1. this p-value would have been less sensitive and would have provided stronger evidence for the researcher’s hypothesis. state the p-value, rounding to 5 decimal places.

0.00002and also P value =0.00003## How to solve for the p value

success 0f 86%0.86success 0f 60%difference= 0.86-0.6= 0.26Z stat= (0.26-0)/0.0628= 4.14110.00002and also0.00003p valuehere: