At this point, the writer is considering adding the
following sentence.
When it was painted in 1932, Siqueiros’s mural
was considered offensive, but now it is
acclaimed.
Should the writer make this addition here?
A) Yes, because it provides historical context for the
changes discussed in the passage.
B) Yes, because it provides a useful reminder of
how people once viewed Siqueiros’s work.
C) No, because it unnecessarily repeats information
from earlier in the passage.
D) No, because it makes a claim about Siqueiros’s
work that is not supported by the passage.
-
No, because it unnecessarily repeats information from earlier in the passage.The correct option is C.Siqueiros’ method of painting-
- It dried more quickly than oil paint did, allowing him to quickly add additional layers. His right sleeve’s impasto, or thick layer of paint, is itself an abstract piece of art.
- Siqueiros passed away in 1977, but his revolutionary essays and murals have cemented his place in both Mexican and art history.
- C is the right response since information about the initial response to Siqueiros‘ mural and its subsequent rediscovery is already provided in the text and is not required to bring up the succeeding forward-looking sentence.
- Because they each offer an improper interpretation of the sentence that the writer is thinking of include, Options A, B, and D are incorrect.
Learn more about Siqueiros paintbrainly.com/question/23184224#SPJ4